{"id":14119,"date":"2026-05-04T17:20:59","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T17:20:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/2026\/05\/07\/rsa-conference-2026-wrap-up-dach-ciso-hausaufgaben-pqc\/"},"modified":"2026-07-09T16:45:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T16:45:00","slug":"rsa-conference-2026-wrap-up-dach-ciso-hausaufgaben-pqc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/2026\/05\/04\/rsa-conference-2026-wrap-up-dach-ciso-hausaufgaben-pqc\/","title":{"rendered":"RSA Conference 2026: PQC Migration"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"color:#69d8ed;font-size:0.9em;margin:0 0 16px;padding:0;\">7 min read<\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\"><strong>The RSA Conference 2026 wrapped up on 1 May. With 41,000 attendees, 670 exhibitors and 480 sessions, anyone returning from DACH is bound to have sore legs, a stack of business cards \u2013 and, ideally, a roadmap for 2026. The top five themes filtering out of the noise: Post-Quantum Cryptography as a migration mandate, Detection-as-Code as the new standard, AI in the SOC workflow, vendor consolidation as a board-level question, and Identity Threat Detection as an unexpectedly urgent gap. These five will dominate DACH CISO agendas over the next twelve months.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 18px;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.5);font-size:0.85em;\"><em>04.05.2026<\/em><\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#003340;color:#fff;padding:32px 36px;margin:32px 0;border-radius:8px;\">\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 18px 0;font-size:0.95em;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.2em;color:#69d8ed;border-bottom:2px solid rgba(105,216,237,0.25);padding-bottom:12px;\">Key Takeaways<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin:0;padding-left:22px;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.92);line-height:1.6;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:12px;\"><strong style=\"color:#69d8ed;\">PQC is a migration mandate, not a research topic:<\/strong> NIST FIPS 203\/204\/205 are final, BSI TR-02102-1 Post-Quantum guidance 2026 is live. Starting a crypto inventory in 2027 is already too late.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:12px;\"><strong style=\"color:#69d8ed;\">Detection-as-Code has become the standard:<\/strong> Sigma rules, detection libraries with Git workflows and CI validation have replaced the classic correlation-rule editor in major vendor demos. When RFP-ing SIEM in 2026, ask for the detection repo, not the UI.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:12px;\"><strong style=\"color:#69d8ed;\">Vendor consolidation is now a board-level question:<\/strong> DACH conglomerates average 47 security tools (Gartner Q1\/2026). By 2028, 78 % of CISOs aim to consolidate to 25 or fewer. This will dominate Q-reviews in 2026\/2027.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"font-size:0.88em;color:#b8c5ce;margin:20px 0 32px 0;border-top:1px solid rgba(230,227,218,0.12);border-bottom:1px solid rgba(230,227,218,0.12);padding:10px 0;\"><span style=\"color:#003340;font-weight:700;text-transform:uppercase;font-size:0.72em;letter-spacing:0.14em;margin-right:14px;\">Related:<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/2026\/04\/29\/litellm-cve-2026-42208-unauthorized-database-access\/\" style=\"color:#333;text-decoration:underline;\">LiteLLM CVE-2026-42208: SQL Injection in AI Proxy Infrastructure<\/a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style=\"color:#ccc;\">\/<\/span>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/2026\/04\/28\/eu-ai-act-high-risk-deadline-august-2026-supervisory-gap\/\" style=\"color:#333;text-decoration:underline;\">EU AI Act High-Risk Deadline 2 August 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:64px;margin-bottom:20px;\">What\u2019s truly new in 2026<\/h2>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\"><strong>What does RSA Conference 2026 signal?<\/strong> A 41,000-attendee, 670-exhibitor, 480-session trade show held annually in San Francisco since 1995. It\u2019s less a launch pad than a sorting mechanism: features appearing on multiple booth stages simultaneously become de-facto standards within twelve months; anything confined to a single demo pod is hype. CISOs returning from DACH rank takeaways by frequency, not stagecraft.<\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\">The 2026 edition pivots from grand platform visions to operational realities. Vendor consolidation, identity-layer hardening and PQC migration aren\u2019t buzzwords \u2013 they\u2019re roadmap items with budgets and deadlines. Keynotes from Cisco, CrowdStrike and Wiz traded disruption rhetoric for architectural substance.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:64px;margin-bottom:20px;\">The CISO\u2019s Five Homework Assignments in the DACH Region<\/h2>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\"><strong>First, start the Post-Quantum Cryptography migration.<\/strong> NIST FIPS 203, 204 and 205 are final; BSI has activated the first PQC recommendations in TR-02102-1. RSAC sessions on crypto inventories were packed to capacity. The assignment: conduct a crypto inventory across TLS, VPN, code-signing, hardware-security modules and identify which components must speak hybrid PQC by 2027 or 2028 and pure PQC from 2030 onward. Realistic migration window: 18\u201324 months for inventory and architecture adjustments.<\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\"><strong>Second, make Detection-as-Code mandatory for every SIEM.<\/strong> Major SIEM vendors (Splunk, Elastic, Sumo Logic, Microsoft Sentinel) revealed at RSAC that their detection content will live natively in Sigma or YAML repos by 2026, with Git workflows, pull requests and CI validation. The SOC operating model is shifting from UI-click operators to detection engineers. The assignment: adapt SOC skill profiles and tooling pipelines, or the detection backlog will run dry by 2027.<\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\"><strong>Third, AI in the SOC is no longer a demo \u2013 it\u2019s workflow.<\/strong> Microsoft Security Copilot, Google Security AI, CrowdStrike Charlotte and IBM watsonx Cybersecurity are already visible in production bank SOCs. The operational reality: Tier-1 triage by AI with human override on escalation reduces mean time to resolution by 35\u201350 %. The assignment: tighten data hygiene and logging schemas, because the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/2026\/04\/29\/litellm-cve-2026-42208-unauthorized-database-access\/\" style=\"color:#69d8ed;text-decoration:underline;\">AI proxy layer<\/a> is also an attack surface.<\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\"><strong>Fourth, vendor consolidation is now a board-level question.<\/strong> 47 tools per DACH group (Gartner Q1\/2026), 78 % want to cut that to 25 or fewer. This isn\u2019t an efficiency drive \u2013 it\u2019s an operational intervention: fewer tools mean narrower skill spread, clearer data flows and stronger vendor trust per tool. The RSAC vendor hall showed platform consolidators (Palo Alto Networks Cortex, Microsoft Defender, CrowdStrike Falcon) far more visible than point solutions. The assignment: 90-day audit of the tool landscape with a clear list of candidates for retirement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\"><strong>Fifth, Identity Threat Detection is the surprise gap.<\/strong> Multiple RSAC sessions backed with data that current EDR\/XDR stacks only partially cover identity threats (token theft, session hijacking, OAuth phishing). Dedicated ITDR solutions (Authomize, Silverfort, CrowdStrike Identity Protection) occupied every second booth. The assignment: review the identity layer in the SOC stack and run gap analyses with the IAM team.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background:#003340;color:#fff;padding:28px 32px;margin:32px 0;border-radius:8px;\">\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 14px 0;font-size:0.9em;font-weight:800;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.18em;color:#69d8ed;border-bottom:2px solid rgba(105,216,237,0.25);padding-bottom:10px;\">Migration Timeline: PQC and Detection-as-Code in the DACH CISO Plan<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:0.95em;line-height:1.6;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.92);\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:rgba(105,216,237,0.12);\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#69d8ed;\">Phase<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#69d8ed;\">PQC Migration<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#69d8ed;\">Detection-as-Code<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Q2\u2013Q3 2026<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Crypto inventory, vendor RFIs, PQC roadmap draft<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Set up detection repository, begin Sigma migration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:rgba(255,255,255,0.03);\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Q4 2026<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Architecture pilot with hybrid algorithms<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Activate CI pipeline with detection validation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">H1 2027<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">TLS migration of critical workloads<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Detection-engineer skill build-out in SOC complete<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:rgba(255,255,255,0.03);\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">H2 2027<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Code-signing and HSM migration<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Detection-coverage reporting to executive board<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">2028+<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Crypto-agility as default in new architectures<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px 12px;text-align:left;color:#fff;\">Detection engineering in standard CISO reporting<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"margin:14px 0 0 0;font-size:0.85em;color:rgba(255,255,255,0.7);line-height:1.5;\">Sources: NIST FIPS 203\/204\/205 Final, BSI TR-02102-1 Post-Quantum Recommendations 2026, RSAC 2026 sessions on Detection-as-Code (Splunk, Microsoft, Elastic), proprietary research from two DACH Tier-1 bank CISO interviews, April 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:64px;margin-bottom:20px;\">Two DACH CISO Voices from San Francisco<\/h2>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\">Two CISOs from major German banks shared their takeaways from the conference \u2013 verbatim quotes without names for compliance reasons.<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"border-left:4px solid #69d8ed;background:#f4fbfc;padding:18px 24px;margin:24px 0;font-style:italic;line-height:1.7;color:#2a4a52;\"><p>&#8220;We came with three items on our list and are leaving with five. Identity Threat Detection wasn\u2019t on the agenda \u2013 now it\u2019s our top priority for Q3. We can cover the spread from our current budget because we\u2019re saving six figures by consolidating our EDR stack.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote style=\"border-left:4px solid #69d8ed;background:#f4fbfc;padding:18px 24px;margin:24px 0;font-style:italic;line-height:1.7;color:#2a4a52;\"><p>&#8220;For us, PQC isn\u2019t 2030 \u2013 it\u2019s 2027. Regulators have already flagged missing crypto inventories. What San Francisco clarified is that NIST FIPS 203 will be production-ready, not stuck in research limbo. That unlocks the budget.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:64px;margin-bottom:20px;\">What\u2019s Tipping: Honest Trade-Offs<\/h2>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\">Three friction points sit inside the five action items. First, vendor consolidation erodes trust: a two-platform stack has less resilience against vendor failures or supply-chain incidents than a point-tool mix. Teams that consolidate must rethink vendor diversity \u2013 think multi-region contracts or backup vendors for detection content. Second, Detection-as-Code demands engineering skills in the SOC that aren\u2019t standard today. Expect three to six months of upskilling per analyst. Third, AI in the SOC cuts Tier-1 load but makes Tier-2 more complex: fewer routine triage tickets, more escalation analysis with murky causality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:20px;\">The honest takeaway from the sessions: nobody has a complete 2026 plan; everyone runs roadmaps with assumptions. Teams that communicate transparently earn more board trust than those that deliver polished answers.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-top:64px;margin-bottom:20px;\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<p class=\"st-faq-hint\">Every question is locked. A tap unlocks the answer.<\/p>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>Which crypto components are most urgent in the PQC migration?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 4px 24px;color:#555;line-height:1.6;\">TLS termination at external endpoints and code-signing infrastructure sit at the top because their crypto provenance must remain auditable for years. VPN concentrators and HSMs follow, often with longer hardware lifecycles than planned. JWT signing in API gateways and qualified electronic signatures round out the critical list.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>Is Detection-as-Code worth it for mid-sized SOCs (5 to 15 analysts)?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 4px 24px;color:#555;line-height:1.6;\">Yes \u2013 it accelerates onboarding of new detection content and enables versioning. For smaller teams, a single Sigma repo with GitHub Actions validation and manual deployment suffices. Typical build-and-maintain effort is 0.3 to 0.7 FTE in year one, then 0.2 FTE per 100 detection rules thereafter.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>How many security tools are a realistic target after consolidation?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 4px 24px;color:#555;line-height:1.6;\">Gartner cites 25 as the median target state for DACH large enterprises by 2028. A realistic corridor: 30 to 35 tools for complex landscapes, 15 to 20 for mid-market firms. Below 10 becomes risky: too much vendor concentration and loss of best-of-breed advantages for niche use-cases.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>Where does Identity Threat Detection fit into the existing SOC stack?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 4px 24px;color:#555;line-height:1.6;\">ITDR sits between IAM and SIEM. It consumes identity events (logins, token issuances, privilege escalations) from AD\/Entra ID\/Okta and correlates them with SIEM data. Implementation effort for a mid-sized setup: three to six months, with a focus on identity-event schema and token lifecycle analysis.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<div style=\"background:#f5f5f7;padding:24px 28px;margin:48px 0 24px 0;border-radius:8px;\">\n<p style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0;font-size:0.78em;font-weight:800;color:#003340;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.14em;\">About the Author<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:0;font-size:0.98em;line-height:1.7;color:#333;\"><strong>Alec Chizhik<\/strong> writes for SecurityToday on cybersecurity in production environments. Focus: architecture decisions and operational realities, measured against total cost of ownership rather than vendor promises.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"margin:32px 0 24px 0;\">\n<!--ST-LOWER-CARDS lang=en--><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin:48px 0 18px;padding-left:12px;font-size:1.05em;font-weight:800;color:#e6e3da;border-left:3px solid #69d8ed;line-height:1.2;\">More from the MBF Media Network<\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cloudmagazin.com\/en\/2026\/04\/28\/architecture-drives-compliance-costs\/\" style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;gap:14px;padding:12px 14px;margin:0 0 10px;background:#23261f;border:1px solid rgba(105,216,237,0.18);border-radius:12px;box-shadow:inset 0 1px 0 rgba(230,227,218,0.06),0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.22);text-decoration:none;color:#e6e3da;box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;\"><span style=\"flex:0 0 116px;aspect-ratio:16\/9;overflow:hidden;border-radius:8px;background:#111210;border:1px solid rgba(230,227,218,0.08);display:block;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/net-bsi-kritis-cloud-multi-cloud-compliance-61618487.jpg\" alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"116\" height=\"65\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;display:block;\"><\/span><span style=\"display:block;min-width:0;\"><span style=\"display:block;font-size:0.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:0.1em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#0bb7fd;margin-bottom:5px;\">cloudmagazin<\/span><span style=\"display:block;font-size:1.0em;font-weight:650;line-height:1.35;color:#e6e3da;overflow-wrap:anywhere;\">Architecture Drives Compliance Costs: How to Cut Them<\/span><\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/mybusinessfuture.com\/en\/risk-shift-playing-it-safe-becomes-2026s-costliest-strategy\/\" style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;gap:14px;padding:12px 14px;margin:0 0 10px;background:#23261f;border:1px solid rgba(105,216,237,0.18);border-radius:12px;box-shadow:inset 0 1px 0 rgba(230,227,218,0.06),0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.22);text-decoration:none;color:#e6e3da;box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;\"><span style=\"flex:0 0 116px;aspect-ratio:16\/9;overflow:hidden;border-radius:8px;background:#111210;border:1px solid rgba(230,227,218,0.08);display:block;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/net-risikoprofil-april-2026-vorsicht-mittels-36498743-250x141.jpg\" alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"116\" height=\"65\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;display:block;\"><\/span><span style=\"display:block;min-width:0;\"><span style=\"display:block;font-size:0.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:0.1em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#aa8ac2;margin-bottom:5px;\">MyBusinessFuture<\/span><span style=\"display:block;font-size:1.0em;font-weight:650;line-height:1.35;color:#e6e3da;overflow-wrap:anywhere;\">Risk Shift: Playing It Safe Becomes 2026\u2019s Costliest Strategy<\/span><\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.digital-chiefs.de\/en\/ai-governance-2026-system-level-not-excel-compliance\/\" style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;gap:14px;padding:12px 14px;margin:0 0 10px;background:#23261f;border:1px solid rgba(105,216,237,0.18);border-radius:12px;box-shadow:inset 0 1px 0 rgba(230,227,218,0.06),0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.22);text-decoration:none;color:#e6e3da;box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;\"><span style=\"flex:0 0 116px;aspect-ratio:16\/9;overflow:hidden;border-radius:8px;background:#111210;border:1px solid rgba(230,227,218,0.08);display:block;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/net-ai-governance-2026-system-level-vorstand-12449460-250x143.jpg\" alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"116\" height=\"65\" style=\"width:100%;height:100%;object-fit:cover;display:block;\"><\/span><span style=\"display:block;min-width:0;\"><span style=\"display:block;font-size:0.68em;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:0.1em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#e8828d;margin-bottom:5px;\">Digital Chiefs<\/span><span style=\"display:block;font-size:1.0em;font-weight:650;line-height:1.35;color:#e6e3da;overflow-wrap:anywhere;\">AI Governance 2026: System\u2011Level, Not Excel Compliance<\/span><\/span><\/a><!--\/ST-LOWER-CARDS--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"RSAC 2026 has translated five topics from the vendor hall into mandatory CISO tasks: P","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":14006,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"RSAC 2026","_yoast_wpseo_title":"RSA Conference 2026: PQC Migration","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"RSA Conference 2026: Five Key Topics from San Francisco \u2013 PQC Migration, Detection-as-Code, AI SOC, Vendor Consolidation, Identity Threat Detection.","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-adv":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_opengraph-image-id":0,"_yoast_wpseo_twitter-title":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-description":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-image":"","_yoast_wpseo_twitter-image-id":0,"_evm_slot_owner":"","evm_cvss":0,"evm_risk":0,"evm_casefile":"","evm_primary_cve":"","evm_pin_until":0,"evm_external_preview_token":"","evm_external_preview_expires":"","_evm_translation_lang":"","featured_post":0,"featured_post_sortierung":0,"_wp_old_slug":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[216,259],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-events","category-strategie-governance-en"],"evm_reading_time_minutes":8,"wpml_language":"en","wpml_translation_of":14007,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14119"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14119\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21394,"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14119\/revisions\/21394"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.securitytoday.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}